Skip to content

BioStride and NeXus Alignment Analysis

Note: This document was generated using Claude (Anthropic's AI assistant) through automated analysis of documentation and web sources. While efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, there may be errors or outdated information. Please verify critical details with official NeXus documentation.

Overview

This document analyzes the alignment between the BioStride schema and the NeXus data format, identifying areas of compatibility, key differences, and opportunities for integration.

Fundamental Differences in Scope and Purpose

NeXus

  • Primary domain: Neutron, X-ray, and muon scattering facilities
  • Data model: HDF5-based hierarchical storage with strict structural conventions
  • Focus: Raw experimental data capture at beamlines/instruments
  • Standardization: International standard governed by NIAC (NeXus International Advisory Committee)
  • Adoption: In use at major facilities including SOLEIL, Diamond, SINQ, SNS, ISIS, DESY

BioStride

  • Primary domain: Structural biology across multiple techniques
  • Data model: LinkML semantic schema (generates JSON, YAML, RDF)
  • Focus: End-to-end workflow from sample preparation to final structures
  • Standardization: Research schema for multimodal imaging integration
  • Target: Biological research community, particularly structural biology

Structural Alignment

NeXus Concept BioStride Equivalent Alignment Notes
NXentry Dataset/Study Both serve as top-level containers, but BioStride separates Dataset (collection) from Study (investigation)
NXsample Sample ✅ Strong alignment - both capture specimen details, composition, preparation
NXinstrument Instrument ✅ Similar hierarchy with instrument-specific subclasses (CryoEMInstrument, XRayInstrument, SAXSInstrument)
NXdetector Embedded in Instrument classes BioStride integrates detector specs within instrument definitions
NXdata DataFile/Image Different approach - NeXus links to data arrays, BioStride tracks files/images as entities
NXprocess WorkflowRun ✅ Both capture processing workflows and parameters
NXuser operator_id fields BioStride uses simpler person references
NXsource Part of Instrument classes BioStride embeds source info in XRayInstrument.source_type
NXbeam Instrument parameters Beam characteristics distributed across instrument attributes

Technical Compatibility

Areas of Strong Alignment

  1. SAXS/WAXS Data
  2. Both support small-angle scattering with similar parameters
  3. Common fields: q-range, detector distance, sample-detector geometry

  4. NeXus NXsas maps well to BioStride SAXSInstrument

  5. X-ray Crystallography

  6. NeXus NXmx (macromolecular crystallography) aligns with BioStride's approach
  7. Both capture: beam energy, detector type, crystal parameters

  8. Gold Standard NXmx could inform BioStride crystallography extensions

  9. Sample Metadata

  10. Temperature, pressure, humidity conditions
  11. Buffer composition and pH

  12. Sample concentration and preparation methods

  13. Processing Provenance

  14. Software name and version tracking
  15. Processing parameters and computational resources
  16. Workflow state and completion status

Key Differences

  1. Storage Model
  2. NeXus: Requires HDF5 binary format for efficient large dataset storage

  3. BioStride: Format-agnostic semantic model (LinkML generates multiple formats)

  4. Cryo-EM Support

  5. BioStride: Extensive cryo-EM modeling with specialized classes

  6. NeXus: Emerging NXem definition, primarily materials-focused

  7. Biological Context

  8. BioStride: Rich biological metadata (sequences, PTMs, molecular composition)

  9. NeXus: Technique-focused, minimal biological annotation

  10. Image Types

  11. BioStride: Explicitly models FTIR, fluorescence, optical, XRF as distinct classes

  12. NeXus: Generic detector/data array approach

  13. Data Organization

  14. NeXus: Single-file hierarchical structure (HDF5)
  15. BioStride: Distributed model with file references

Integration Opportunities

BioStride → NeXus Export

# Potential mapping example
biostride_study → NXentry
├── biostride_sample → NXsample
├── biostride_instrument → NXinstrument
│   └── detector_specs → NXdetector
├── biostride_experiment_run → NXcollection
└── biostride_workflow_run → NXprocess

Key mappings: - Map BioStride's SAXSInstrument to NXsas application definition - Convert XRayInstrument data to NXmx for crystallography - Transform CryoEMInstrument to emerging NXem standard

NeXus → BioStride Import

  • Import NeXus raw data references as BioStride DataFile entities
  • Extract instrument metadata from NeXus files to populate Instrument classes
  • Parse NXdetector data to enhance BioStride Image metadata
  • Map NXprocess chains to WorkflowRun sequences

Complementary Strengths

NeXus Strengths

  • Facility Integration: Mature standard at synchrotrons and neutron sources
  • Performance: HDF5 backend optimized for multi-GB datasets
  • Real-time Support: Designed for streaming data during acquisition
  • Detector Details: Comprehensive detector characterization and calibration

BioStride Strengths

  • Biological Modeling: Sequences, modifications, complexes, ligands
  • Multi-modal Integration: Unified schema across cryo-EM, FTIR, fluorescence
  • Workflow Tracking: End-to-end provenance from sample to publication
  • Semantic Web: RDF/OWL generation for knowledge graphs

1. Dual-Schema Approach

Use both schemas for their strengths: - NeXus: Raw data acquisition and storage at facilities - BioStride: Sample tracking, biological annotation, multi-technique integration

2. Linking Strategy

# BioStride DataFile referencing NeXus data
DataFile:
  file_path: /data/nexus/2024/exp001.h5
  file_format: hdf5
  data_type: raw
  metadata:
    nexus_path: "/entry/instrument/detector/data"
    nexus_version: "2024.02"

3. Vocabulary Harmonization

Align common concepts: - Sample preparation protocols - Instrument specifications - Quality metrics - Processing parameters

4. Tool Development

Create converters for common workflows: - nexus2biostride: Extract metadata from NeXus files - biostride2nexus: Export to NeXus for facility deposition - Validation tools ensuring compatibility

Future Directions

Potential Standardization Efforts

  1. Joint Working Group: Establish collaboration between NeXus NIAC and structural biology communities
  2. Cryo-EM Extensions: Contribute BioStride's cryo-EM model to enhance NXem
  3. Biological Extensions: Propose NXbiomolecule base class for NeXus
  4. Multimodal Support: Develop application definitions for integrated experiments

Technical Developments

  1. HDF5 Backend for LinkML: Enable direct HDF5 generation from BioStride schemas
  2. NeXus Validator for BioStride: Ensure exported data meets NeXus requirements
  3. Metadata Bridges: Automated extraction and transformation tools
  4. Federated Queries: Query across BioStride and NeXus datasets

Conclusion

BioStride and NeXus are complementary rather than competing standards. NeXus excels at facility-level data capture with its mature HDF5-based infrastructure, while BioStride provides the biological context and multi-technique integration essential for modern structural biology.

The optimal approach involves: - Using NeXus at data acquisition (beamlines, microscopes) - Employing BioStride for biological annotation and workflow management - Building bridges between the formats for seamless data flow - Contributing domain expertise bidirectionally between communities

This alignment analysis suggests that both schemas can coexist and reinforce each other in the structural biology data ecosystem, with clear paths for integration and mutual enhancement.