Skip to content

Based on all of the information I've gathered, I'll now review the GO-CAM model gomodel:5f46c3b700001570 titled "SPModule TBK1-IRF3".

Review of GO-CAM Model: SPModule TBK1-IRF3 (gomodel:5f46c3b700001570)

Overview

This model represents a signaling pathway involving TBK1 (TANK-binding kinase 1) and IRF3 (Interferon Regulatory Factor 3), which are key proteins in the innate immune response against viruses. The model describes the phosphorylation cascade where TBK1 activates IRF3, leading to IRF3's DNA-binding and transcriptional activation activities.

Model Structure

The model consists of 5 activities: 1. TBK1 protein serine/threonine kinase activity 2. IRF3 protein homodimerization activity 3. IRF3 protein binding activity 4. IRF3 sequence-specific DNA binding activity 5. IRF3 DNA-binding transcription activator activity

The causal flow follows: TBK1 kinase activity → IRF3 homodimerization → IRF3 protein binding → IRF3 DNA binding → IRF3 transcriptional activation

Strengths of the Model

  1. Accurate biological process representation: The model correctly represents the established pathway of TBK1-mediated phosphorylation of IRF3, leading to IRF3 homodimerization, nuclear translocation, and activation of interferon gene transcription.

  2. Correct causal associations: The model uses the appropriate causal relation "directly positively regulates" (RO:0002629) between activities, which correctly represents the flow of the signaling cascade.

  3. Appropriate cellular locations: The model correctly localizes TBK1 kinase activity in the cytoplasm (GO:0005737) and IRF3's DNA binding and transcriptional activities in the nucleus (GO:0005634).

  4. Solid evidence basis: Each activity and causal relation is supported by primary research literature with proper evidence codes (ECO:0000314 - direct assay evidence used in manual assertion).

Issues and Suggested Improvements

  1. Phosphorylation representation: While the model shows TBK1 kinase activity leading to IRF3 homodimerization, it doesn't explicitly represent the phosphorylation of IRF3 at serine residues 385 and 386, which is a critical step. Consider adding this detail as it's a key molecular event in this pathway.

  2. Missing adaptor proteins: The literature indicates that adaptor proteins like MAVS, STING1, or TICAM1 are first phosphorylated by TBK1 on their pLxIS motif, leading to recruitment of IRF3, which enables IRF3 phosphorylation by TBK1. These adaptor proteins are missing from the model, making the pathway representation incomplete.

  3. IRF3 nuclear translocation: The model shows IRF3 binding to DNA in the nucleus after homodimerization, but it doesn't explicitly represent IRF3's translocation from cytoplasm to nucleus. While this can be inferred, explicitly representing this step would improve clarity.

  4. Downstream gene activation: The model ends with IRF3's transcriptional activator activity but doesn't represent the activation of specific downstream genes like IFNB (interferon beta) and other interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs). Adding these would complete the biological story.

  5. Complex representation: According to the GO-CAM guidelines for complexes, when the subunit that carries the activity is known (as in this case), the activities should be represented by the specific proteins carrying them. The model follows this guideline correctly.

Technical Aspects

  1. Evidence codes: All assertions use the ECO:0000314 (direct assay evidence used in manual assertion), which is appropriate since the evidence is from experimental publications.

  2. Protein identity: The model correctly identifies the proteins using UniProtKB accessions (Q9UHD2 for TBK1 and Q14653 for IRF3).

  3. Ontology term usage: The molecular functions and cellular components are represented using appropriate GO terms.

Conclusion

Overall, this is a well-constructed GO-CAM model that accurately represents the TBK1-IRF3 signaling pathway central to antiviral immune responses. The main areas for improvement are the inclusion of adaptor proteins that facilitate IRF3 recruitment and phosphorylation, explicit representation of IRF3 phosphorylation and nuclear translocation, and extension to downstream gene activation events. These additions would make the model more complete and informative.

The model is consistent with current knowledge about TBK1 and IRF3 function in antiviral responses and follows GO-CAM annotation guidelines appropriately.