Skip to content

Based on my review of the GO-CAM model and related information, I'll now provide a comprehensive assessment of the model.

Review of GO-CAM Model: gomodel:60418ffa00000811 (Inosine catabolic process in Mouse)

Model Overview

This GO-CAM model (gomodel:60418ffa00000811) represents the inosine catabolic pathway in mouse. The model captures the enzymatic conversion of inosine to allantoin through a series of reactions involving multiple enzymes, occurring primarily in cytosol and peroxisomes.

Biological Content Assessment

The model correctly represents the purine degradation pathway, specifically focusing on inosine catabolism. It shows the progression from inosine through hypoxanthine, xanthine, urate, 5-hydroxyisourate (HIU), 2-oxo-4-hydroxy-4-carboxy-5-ureidoimidazoline (OHCU), and finally to allantoin.

The key enzymes represented include: 1. Purine-nucleoside phosphorylase (Pnp, MGI:MGI:97365) 2. Xanthine dehydrogenase/oxidase (Xdh, MGI:MGI:98973) with various activities 3. Urate oxidase (Uox, MGI:MGI:98907) 4. OHCU decarboxylase (Urad, MGI:MGI:3647519) 5. HIU hydrolase (Urah, MGI:MGI:1916142)

Consistency with Literature

The model is well-supported by the literature cited. The PMID:30936145 paper confirms the role of xanthine oxidoreductase in uric acid metabolism in mice. PMID:16462750 provides detailed information about the enzymatic steps that convert uric acid into allantoin, particularly highlighting the roles of HIU hydrolase and OHCU decarboxylase.

The cited literature (PMID:16462750) clarifies why complete enzymatic degradation of uric acid to allantoin requires multiple enzymes rather than just urate oxidase - it helps produce the correct stereoisomer (S-(+)-allantoin) and prevents accumulation of reactive intermediates.

Protein Functions

The functions assigned to the proteins in the model match what's known from UniProt and the literature: - Xanthine dehydrogenase/oxidase (Xdh) correctly shows multiple activities including hypoxanthine dehydrogenase, hypoxanthine oxidase, xanthine dehydrogenase, and xanthine oxidase activities - The model appropriately captures the subcellular localization of activities (cytosol vs. peroxisome) - The causal relationships between activities follow the expected metabolic flow

GO-CAM Best Practice Assessment

Model Structure

The model follows GO-CAM best practices by: 1. Using appropriate molecular function terms for each enzyme 2. Providing cellular component information for activities 3. Using the "provides input for" (RO:0002413) causal relationship to connect activities in a metabolic pathway 4. Including the biological process context (inosine catabolic process, GO:0006148)

Evidence and Provenance

Each assertion is well documented with: - Appropriate evidence codes (ECO terms) - Primary literature citations (PMIDs) - Provenance information (contributor ORCID and dates)

The model uses a variety of evidence types, including: - ECO:0000314 (direct assay evidence) - ECO:0000315 (mutant phenotype evidence) - ECO:0000266 (sequence orthology evidence)

Complex Representation

The model does not involve protein complexes, so the complex annotation guidelines are not applicable in this case. Each protein is correctly annotated with its specific activity.

Recommendations for Improvement

  1. Output molecules: While the model includes an output molecule for allantoin (CHEBI:15676) from URAD activity, it would be more complete to include the intermediate metabolites as outputs for each enzymatic step in the pathway.

  2. Regulatory aspects: The model focuses on the core catalytic pathway but does not include any regulatory aspects. If literature evidence exists, adding known regulatory mechanisms affecting these enzymes would enhance the model.

  3. Alternative isoforms: The model could potentially include the alternative transcripts of HIU hydrolase (Urah) mentioned in PMID:16462750, which lack the peroxisomal targeting signal and might function in different cellular locations.

Conclusion

Overall, this is a well-constructed GO-CAM model that accurately represents the inosine catabolic pathway in mouse. It is consistent with the literature, follows GO-CAM best practices, and is supported by appropriate evidence. The model effectively captures both the enzymatic activities and their subcellular localization, providing a clear representation of this metabolic pathway.

The model is particularly valuable for showing the complete enzymatic pathway from inosine to allantoin, including the recently elucidated steps involving HIU hydrolase and OHCU decarboxylase that ensure efficient conversion of uric acid to the correct stereoisomer of allantoin.