Skip to content

Based on my review of the GO-CAM model 60418ffa00001536 "Deoxyguanosine catabolic process (Mouse)" and the available references, I will now provide a comprehensive review of the model:

GO-CAM Model Review: gomodel:60418ffa00001536

Overview

This model represents the deoxyguanosine catabolic process in mouse. It shows the enzymatic pathway for degrading deoxyguanosine through several molecular activities connected by causal relationships. The model was created by contributor ORCID:0000-0001-7476-6306 on March 25, 2021.

Biological Content Assessment

The model accurately represents the deoxyguanosine catabolic pathway in mouse with the following key activities:

  1. Purine-nucleoside phosphorylase activity (GO:0004731) by PNP (MGI:MGI:97365) in the cytosol
  2. Guanine deaminase activity (GO:0008892) by Gda (MGI:MGI:95678) in the cytosol
  3. Xanthine dehydrogenase activity (GO:0004854) and xanthine oxidase activity (GO:0004855) by Xdh (MGI:MGI:98973) in cytosol and peroxisome
  4. Urate oxidase activity (GO:0004846) by Uox (MGI:MGI:98907) in peroxisome
  5. Hydroxyisourate hydrolase activity (GO:0033971) by Urah (MGI:MGI:1916142) in peroxisome
  6. 2-oxo-4-hydroxy-4-carboxy-5-ureidoimidazoline decarboxylase activity (GO:0051997) by Urad (MGI:MGI:3647519) in peroxisome

Strengths:

  1. The model accurately represents the enzymatic steps in purine degradation from deoxyguanosine to allantoin as documented in the literature.
  2. The enzymatic activities are properly connected with causal relationships (RO:0002413 "provides input for").
  3. Cellular locations are correctly specified (cytosol and peroxisome).
  4. Each activity has appropriate literature evidence (primarily from PMID:16462750, PMID:8226898, and others).
  5. The model shows the correct branching of activities, particularly with xanthine dehydrogenase/oxidase having two functions.

GO-CAM Best Practices Evaluation

Model Structure:

  1. Activities and causal connections: The model correctly uses the "provides input for" (RO:0002413) predicate to connect the sequential enzymatic activities in the pathway.
  2. Evidence: Each assertion is properly supported with evidence references.
  3. Cellular components: The model correctly specifies the cellular locations of each activity (peroxisome or cytosol).
  4. Biological process: Activities are appropriately included in the "deoxyguanosine catabolic process" (GO:0006161).

Recommendations for Improvement:

  1. Pathway context: While the model correctly shows the enzymatic steps, it could benefit from adding a connection to the broader purine metabolism context. Consider adding the relationship to purine nucleoside degradation.

  2. Input/Output molecules: The model shows enzyme activities but doesn't explicitly show the chemical transformations. Consider adding the input and output molecules for each enzymatic activity to make the pathway clearer (e.g., deoxyguanosine → guanine → xanthine → urate → hydroxyisourate → OHCU → allantoin).

  3. Completeness of xanthine oxidase representation: The model correctly shows the dual role of Xdh gene product (xanthine dehydrogenase and xanthine oxidase activities), but it might be worth adding a note that these are two forms of the same enzyme with different cofactor preferences (NAD+ vs. O2), as supported by PMID:29895374.

  4. Peroxisomal targeting: According to PMID:16462750, the peroxisomal location of the later enzymes in the pathway (Uox, Urah, Urad) involves peroxisomal targeting sequences. This detail could be added to provide more biological context about the organization of the pathway.

  5. Stereochemistry: PMID:16462750 mentions the importance of the final enzymes in generating dextrorotatory allantoin (S-(+)-allantoin) rather than racemic allantoin. This stereochemical detail could be mentioned as it's an important aspect of the biological versus non-enzymatic conversion.

Conclusion

The GO-CAM model 60418ffa00001536 is a scientifically accurate representation of the deoxyguanosine catabolic pathway in mouse. The model follows GO-CAM best practices with appropriate activity connections, evidence, and cellular locations. The model could be enhanced by adding input/output molecules and more context about the broader metabolic pathway, but these are minor suggestions for an already well-constructed model.

The main strength of this model is the accurate representation of the final steps of urate degradation to allantoin, which involves multiple enzyme activities (Uox, Urah, Urad) as elucidated in PMID:16462750. This pathway is particularly interesting since humans lack this ability to convert uric acid to allantoin due to the loss of functional urate oxidase, which is correctly represented as a mouse-specific pathway in this model.