Skip to content

Now that I have gathered information about the model and its components, I'll provide a comprehensive review of GO-CAM model gomodel:60897d8500000531 (AMP salvage in Mouse).

Review of GO-CAM Model: AMP Salvage (Mouse) - gomodel:60897d8500000531

Overall Assessment

This GO-CAM model represents the AMP salvage pathway in mouse (taxon: NCBITaxon:10090), focusing on enzymes involved in recovering adenine nucleotides through various metabolic routes. The model includes 6 activities that are connected appropriately with causal relationships to represent the flow of metabolism in this pathway.

Strengths

  1. Pathway Representation: The model successfully represents the AMP salvage pathway with appropriate molecular functions, inputs/outputs, and causal connections.

  2. Evidence Base: Each activity and association in the model is well-supported by experimental evidence, primarily with direct assays (ECO:0000314) and mutant phenotype evidence (ECO:0000315) from relevant literature.

  3. Biological Accuracy: The enzymes and reactions represented align with established understanding of purine salvage metabolism, as confirmed by the literature I reviewed.

  4. Use of Causal Associations: The model uses the correct causal predicate (RO:0002413 provides input for) to show how activities are connected in the pathway.

Components of the Model

The model includes the following key enzymes and activities:

  1. Hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase (HPRT, MGI:MGI:96217)
  2. Molecular function: hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase activity (GO:0004422)
  3. Takes hypoxanthine (CHEBI:17368) as input

  4. Provides input for two downstream activities (adenylosuccinate synthase)

  5. Adenine phosphoribosyltransferase (APRT, MGI:MGI:88061)

  6. Molecular function: adenine phosphoribosyltransferase activity (GO:0003999)
  7. Takes adenine (CHEBI:16708) as input

  8. Outputs AMP (CHEBI:16027)

  9. Adenylosuccinate synthase (ADSS1, MGI:MGI:87947 and ADSS2, MGI:MGI:87948)

  10. Molecular function: adenylosuccinate synthase activity (GO:0004019)

  11. Provides input for adenylosuccinate lyase

  12. Adenylosuccinate lyase (ADSL, MGI:MGI:103202)

  13. Molecular function: N6-(1,2-dicarboxyethyl)AMP AMP-lyase (fumarate-forming) activity (GO:0004018)

  14. Outputs AMP (CHEBI:16027)

  15. Adenosine kinase (ADK, MGI:MGI:87930)

  16. Molecular function: adenosine kinase activity (GO:0004001)
  17. Takes adenosine (CHEBI:16335) as input
  18. Outputs AMP (CHEBI:16027)

Compliance with GO-CAM Best Practices

  1. All activities are appropriately enabled by specific genes/proteins rather than using complex IDs, which is appropriate since the specific proteins carrying each activity are known.

  2. The causal relationships are consistently represented using RO:0002413 (provides input for) which is the correct relation for metabolic pathways where one reaction produces a substrate for another.

  3. Input and output molecules are properly annotated for each activity, showing the flow of metabolites through the pathway.

  4. All activities are appropriately part of the biological process "AMP salvage" (GO:0044209).

Biological Accuracy

The model accurately represents the three major routes of AMP salvage:

  1. Adenine salvage via APRT - converting adenine directly to AMP
  2. Hypoxanthine salvage via HPRT - followed by conversion to AMP through ADSS and ADSL
  3. Adenosine salvage via adenosine kinase - directly phosphorylating adenosine to AMP

This is consistent with literature on purine salvage pathways, including the papers cited as evidence in the model and the additional literature I examined.

Suggestions for Improvement

While the model is scientifically accurate and well-constructed, I have a few minor suggestions:

  1. Add specific substrate/product details for the ADSS and ADSL reactions. The intermediate adenylosuccinate is not explicitly shown as an output of ADSS and input to ADSL, which would improve biochemical clarity.

  2. Consider adding cellular location information. While not required, adding cellular component annotations would provide additional context about where these reactions occur.

  3. Possibly include allosteric regulation. If there is evidence for allosteric regulation of these enzymes in the mouse, this could be added using appropriate causal relations for positive or negative regulation.

Conclusion

The GO-CAM model gomodel:60897d8500000531 "AMP salvage (Mouse)" is an accurate, evidence-based representation of the AMP salvage pathway in mouse. It follows GO-CAM best practices and appropriately connects the activities of key enzymes in this metabolic pathway. The model is biologically sound and properly curated with good supporting evidence.

The model would be suitable for release in its current form, with the minor suggestions above being optional enhancements rather than required corrections.