Skip to content

Let me review this GO-CAM model which focuses on gluconeogenesis in mouse. Here's my comprehensive review:

Review of GO-CAM Model: gomodel:61e0e55600001225

Model Overview

  • Title: Gluconeogenesis 1 (Mouse)
  • Taxon: NCBITaxon:10090 (Mouse)
  • Status: Production
  • Comments: Sourced from gomodel:R-HSA-70263

Strengths of the Model

  1. Comprehensive representation of gluconeogenesis pathway: The model captures the key enzymatic steps of gluconeogenesis with appropriate molecular function annotations and cellular locations.

  2. Proper causal connections: The activities are connected using RO:0002413 "provides input for" relation, which appropriately reflects the flow of the pathway.

  3. Evidence-based annotations: Most activities are supported by literature evidence, with a mix of different evidence codes (ECO:0000314 direct assay, ECO:0000315 mutant phenotype, etc.).

  4. Proper subcellular locations: The model correctly represents the different compartments where reactions occur (cytosol, mitochondrial inner membrane, mitochondrial matrix, and endoplasmic reticulum).

  5. Detailed substrate flow: The model traces the conversion from mitochondrial precursors to glucose in the ER, reflecting the actual biological process.

Areas for Improvement

  1. Missing direct evidence for some causal associations: While the molecular functions and biological processes have evidence annotations, the causal associations (RO:0002413 "provides input for") lack direct evidence codes. This is common in GO-CAM models but could be strengthened.

  2. Limited description of regulation: The model focuses primarily on the enzymatic steps but doesn't include regulatory aspects of gluconeogenesis (such as hormonal regulation or transcriptional control).

  3. Missing isoforms: In some cases where multiple isoforms exist for enzymes (like G6pc1 and G6pc3), the model does include both, but some connections may be missing between alternate parallel paths.

Consistency with GO-CAM Best Practices

The model follows GO-CAM best practices by:

  1. Using standard causal relations: The model consistently uses RO:0002413 "provides input for" to connect enzyme activities in sequence.

  2. Proper use of part_of relations: All activities are appropriately marked as part_of GO:0006094 (gluconeogenesis).

  3. Appropriate subcellular locations: Each activity is annotated with the correct cellular component.

  4. Evidence for annotations: Each molecular function and most process annotations have supporting evidence from the scientific literature.

Biological Accuracy

The model accurately represents the gluconeogenesis pathway from a biochemical perspective:

  1. Starting with mitochondrial steps (pyruvate carboxylase, mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase)
  2. Transport of metabolites across the mitochondrial membrane (via SLC25A10 and SLC25A11)
  3. Cytosolic steps involving the conversion of oxaloacetate to phosphoenolpyruvate (via PCK1)
  4. Lower glycolytic enzymes in reverse (ENO1, PGAM1, PGK1, GAPDH, TPI1, ALDOC)
  5. Conversion of fructose-1,6-bisphosphate to fructose-6-phosphate (FBP1)
  6. Isomerization to glucose-6-phosphate (GPI1)
  7. Transport and hydrolysis in the ER (SLC37A4, G6PC1, G6PC3)

Recommendations

  1. Add regulatory elements: Consider adding regulatory components such as CREB, FOXO1, PGC-1α that control the transcription of gluconeogenic enzymes.

  2. Include insulin/glucagon signaling: The model could be expanded to show how hormone signaling regulates this pathway.

  3. Add evidence codes for causal relations: Where possible, add literature evidence for the specific causal connections between activities.

  4. Consider connecting to related pathways: The model could be linked to glycolysis, TCA cycle, or amino acid metabolism to show interconnections.

Conclusion

This GO-CAM model is a well-constructed representation of the gluconeogenesis pathway in mouse. It follows GO-CAM best practices, is supported by literature evidence, and accurately depicts the biological process. The model could be enhanced by including regulatory elements and connecting to related pathways, but it serves as an excellent standalone representation of the core enzymatic steps in gluconeogenesis.