Skip to content

Based on my review of the GO-CAM model with ID 6246724f00001645 (titled "hyaluronan biosynthetic process (Mouse)"), here's my comprehensive review:

GO-CAM Model Review: Hyaluronan Biosynthetic Process (Mouse)

Model ID: gomodel:6246724f00001645

Overall Structure and Content

This model represents the hyaluronan biosynthetic process in mouse, including the key enzymes involved and their relationships. The model includes:

  1. Four hyaluronan synthases (HAS1, HAS2, HAS3) with GO:0050501 (hyaluronan synthase activity)
  2. An ABC transporter (Abcc5) with GO:0140359 (ABC-type transporter activity)
  3. A hyaluronidase (Cemip) with GO:0004415 (hyalurononglucosaminidase activity)

Strengths of the Model

  1. Well-evidenced annotations: The model contains appropriate evidence codes and literature references for most activities.
  2. Cellular localization: The model correctly places activities in appropriate cellular locations, with hyaluronan synthases and ABC transporter at the plasma membrane GO:0005886.
  3. Causal relationships: The model properly represents the flow of biological activities using causal relationships, showing how the hyaluronan synthases provide input for the transporter activity.
  4. Comprehensive representation: The model includes multiple HAS enzymes (HAS1, HAS2, HAS3) which aligns with the literature showing these are three distinct enzymes with slightly different properties but similar functions.

Issues and Recommendations

  1. Missing cellular location for Cemip activity:
  2. The hyalurononglucosaminidase activity by Cemip lacks a cellular location annotation. According to literature, this should occur in a specific cellular compartment.

  3. Recommendation: Add an appropriate cellular component annotation for the Cemip activity.

  4. Input molecules not fully specified:

  5. While Abcc5 has hyaluronic acid listed as a primary input, the HAS enzymes don't have their substrate inputs (UDP-GlcUA and UDP-GlcNAc) explicitly specified.

  6. Recommendation: Add primary input annotations for UDP-GlcUA and UDP-GlcNAc for the HAS enzyme activities.

  7. Evidence consolidation needed:

  8. Some activities have multiple evidence annotations that could be consolidated.

  9. Recommendation: Consider consolidating evidence where appropriate to streamline the model.

  10. Clarify pathway relationship:

  11. The model shows Cemip as part of GO:0030212 (hyaluronan metabolic process) while the other activities are part of GO:0030213 (hyaluronan biosynthetic process).

  12. Recommendation: Clarify if this distinction is intentional, as it might be confusing to have both processes represented in what's titled as a biosynthetic process model.

  13. Transporter mechanism alignment:

  14. Based on PMID:15345330, the model correctly represents the transport role of Abcc5 (Mrp5) in hyaluronan export. This paper provides strong evidence that hyaluronan is exported through an ABC transporter (specifically MRP5), which aligns well with the model.
  15. Recommendation: The model is consistent with this research finding.

Biological Accuracy

The model accurately represents the current understanding of hyaluronan biosynthesis where: - Hyaluronan is synthesized by HAS enzymes (HAS1, HAS2, HAS3) - The polymer is transported across the plasma membrane by ABC transporters - The model aligns with literature showing that MRP5 (Abcc5) is likely the primary transporter for hyaluronan

The model's representation of the sequential activities (synthases → transporter → degradation) follows the accepted biological pathway.

GO-CAM Best Practices Compliance

The model generally follows GO-CAM best practices: - Activities are properly connected with appropriate causal relations - Evidence codes and references are provided for annotations - Protein activities are correctly represented in their cellular context

From a curation standpoint, the model follows the practices outlined in the GO-CAM complex annotation guidelines, as individual proteins with known activities are represented separately rather than as a complex.

Conclusion

This is a well-constructed GO-CAM model that accurately represents the hyaluronan biosynthetic process in mouse. With minor improvements to specify cellular locations and inputs for all activities, the model would be fully compliant with best practices and provide a comprehensive view of hyaluronan biosynthesis. The evidence base is strong, drawing from multiple publications that support the represented biological activities and their relationships.