Skip to content

Based on my review of the GO-CAM model for "Ochratoxin biosynthesis in A. carbonarius" (gomodel:62b4ffe300002512), I'll now provide a thorough assessment of the model's quality and adherence to GO-CAM best practices.

GO-CAM Review: Ochratoxin biosynthesis in A. carbonarius (gomodel:62b4ffe300002512)

Model Overview

This GO-CAM model represents the biosynthesis pathway of ochratoxin A (OTA) in Aspergillus carbonarius. OTA is a potent mycotoxin produced by several Aspergillus and Penicillium species that can contaminate various food commodities. The model depicts four key enzymatic activities in the OTA biosynthetic pathway:

  1. OtaA (UniProtKB:A0A1R3RGK0) - polyketide synthase activity
  2. OtaC (UniProtKB:A0A1R3RGJ7) - oxidoreductase activity
  3. OtaB (UniProtKB:A0A1R3RGK1) - non-ribosomal peptide synthetase activity
  4. OtaD (UniProtKB:A0A1R3RGJ2) - catalytic activity (halogenase)

These activities are connected in a linear pathway leading to the production of ochratoxin A.

Biological Accuracy

The model accurately represents the current scientific understanding of the OTA biosynthetic pathway based on the primary literature (PMID:24699234). The order of enzymatic reactions is consistent with published research:

  1. The pathway begins with OtaA (polyketide synthase) that forms the isocoumarin group from acetyl-CoA and malonyl-CoA, producing a pentaketide structure
  2. OtaC (oxidoreductase) then converts this intermediate
  3. OtaB (NRPS) links L-phenylalanine to the dihydroisocoumarin ring
  4. OtaD (halogenase) performs the final chlorination step to form ochratoxin A

The evidence is primarily from mutant phenotype studies (ECO:0000315) with appropriate PMID references, which is appropriate for this type of pathway.

GO-CAM Structure and Technical Quality

The model follows GO-CAM structural conventions with:

  1. Activities: Each protein is properly associated with its molecular function
  2. Part_of relationships: Each activity is correctly indicated as part_of the "ochratoxin A biosynthetic process" (GO:1900818)
  3. Causal connections: The model uses the appropriate causal relation "provides input for" (RO:0002413) to connect the sequential steps of the pathway
  4. Inputs/outputs: Molecule associations are properly represented with inputs and outputs for the relevant steps:
  5. OtaA has acetyl-CoA (CHEBI:15351) and malonyl-CoA (CHEBI:15531) as inputs
  6. OtaB has L-phenylalanine (CHEBI:17295) as input
  7. OtaD has ochratoxin A (CHEBI:7719) as output

Areas for Improvement

While the model is generally well-constructed, I have identified a few points for enhancement:

  1. Missing intermediate molecules: The model would benefit from including all the intermediate molecules in the pathway to provide a complete representation. For example:
  2. The intermediate 7-methylmellein produced by OtaA
  3. 7-carboxymellein (ochratoxin beta) produced by OtaC

  4. Ochratoxin B produced by OtaB

  5. Specificity of molecular functions:

  6. OtaD is currently annotated with the general term "catalytic activity" (GO:0003824), but a more specific term like "flavin-dependent halogenase activity" would be more appropriate based on the UniProt annotation.

  7. Annotation of OtaC: The literature indicates OtaC is a cytochrome P450 monooxygenase, but it's annotated with the general term "oxidoreductase activity" (GO:0016491). A more specific monooxygenase GO term would be preferable.

  8. Expanding evidence codes: Some causal associations use only the reference (24699234) without the PMID prefix. This should be standardized to ensure proper linking to the literature.

Conclusion

The GO-CAM model "Ochratoxin biosynthesis in A. carbonarius" is a well-constructed, biologically accurate representation of the OTA biosynthetic pathway. It effectively follows GO-CAM best practices and captures the key enzymatic steps involved in ochratoxin A production. The minor improvements suggested would enhance the specificity and completeness of the model without altering its fundamental structure.

The model is parsimonious, representing the essential components of the pathway without unnecessary complexity, and would be easily understandable by researchers familiar with biochemical pathways. The causal flow is logical and supported by experimental evidence from the literature.

Overall, I recommend approval of this GO-CAM model with the suggested minor improvements.