Skip to content

62b4ffe300002959 Aflaroxin Aspergillus parasiticus

Now that I have a good understanding of the GO-CAM model and relevant best practices, let me conduct a thorough review of the GO-CAM model gomodel:62b4ffe300002959 (Aflatoxin biosynthesis pathway in Aspergillus parasiticus).

GO-CAM Review: Aflatoxin Biosynthesis Pathway (gomodel:62b4ffe300002959)

Overview

This GO-CAM model describes the aflatoxin biosynthetic process (GO:0045122) in Aspergillus parasiticus (NCBITaxon:1403190), showing the progression of enzymatic reactions from Hexanoyl-[acp] to various aflatoxin derivatives including aflatoxin B1, B2, G1, and G2. The model includes 23 distinct activities representing the sequential steps in this biosynthetic pathway.

Strengths

  1. Comprehensive Pathway Representation: The model provides a detailed representation of the aflatoxin biosynthetic pathway, including multiple branches that lead to different aflatoxin types.

  2. Evidence Support: Most activities are well-supported with appropriate evidence, primarily using ECO:0000314 (direct assay evidence) or ECO:0000304 (author statement supported by traceable reference).

  3. Detailed Molecular Information: The model includes specific chemical entities as inputs and outputs, clearly showing the progression of chemical transformations.

  4. Cellular Localization: Several activities include cellular localization information (occurs_in), which adds valuable context to the model.

  5. Proper Complex Annotation: The fatty acid synthase complex (GO:0005835) with members Q8TGA1 and Q8TGA2 is correctly annotated according to GO-CAM complex annotation guidelines.

Areas for Improvement

  1. Missing Causal Connections: Several activities are not connected by causal relationships, making parts of the model appear disconnected. For example:
  2. The fatty acid synthase complex activity (62b4ffe300004811) produces Hexanoyl-[acp] but lacks a causal connection to the next step.

  3. Several sequential reactions lack causal connections that would make the flow of the pathway clearer.

  4. Evidence Inconsistencies:

  5. Some causal associations lack evidence annotations (e.g., in activities 62d0afa500000525 and 62d0afa500000528).

  6. One reference is inconsistently formatted with a space after PMID: "PMID: 9835571" rather than "PMID:9835571".

  7. Activity Flow Issues:

  8. The pathway branches showing the formation of different aflatoxin types (B1, B2, G1, G2) lack clear causal connections between some steps.

  9. Some activities have outputs that aren't clearly used as inputs in subsequent steps.

  10. Missing Input Information:

  11. Activity 62d0afa500000564 (nadA protein with flavin reductase activity) has outputs but no inputs specified.

  12. Activity 62d0afa500000525 (aflN with monooxygenase activity) has no specified inputs or outputs.

  13. Incomplete Annotations:

  14. The activity with ID 62e3212700000192 is enabled by "information biomacromolecule" (CHEBI:33695) rather than a specific protein, which is unusual for an enzymatic activity.

Specific Recommendations

  1. Complete Causal Connections:
  2. Add causal relationships (RO:0002413 "provides input for") between sequential steps in the pathway to make the flow clear.

  3. Ensure all activities are connected in the linear portions of the pathway.

  4. Fix Evidence Annotations:

  5. Add evidence to all causal associations.

  6. Fix the inconsistent PMID format (remove space after "PMID:").

  7. Improve Input/Output Annotations:

  8. Specify inputs for activities 62d0afa500000564 and 62d0afa500000525.

  9. Ensure that outputs from one activity match inputs to subsequent activities where appropriate.

  10. Clarify Final Steps:

  11. Make the branching paths to different aflatoxin types (B1, B2, G1, G2) more explicit with appropriate causal connections.

  12. Specific Gene Product:

  13. Replace the generic "information biomacromolecule" (CHEBI:33695) enabler with the specific protein responsible for that activity if known.

Conclusion

The GO-CAM model for aflatoxin biosynthesis in Aspergillus parasiticus is largely well-constructed and provides valuable biological information about this important toxin biosynthetic pathway. With the suggested improvements to causal connections, evidence annotations, and input/output specifications, the model would more clearly represent the biological process and adhere more closely to GO-CAM best practices.

The primary issues are in the connectivity of the pathway steps rather than the biological accuracy of the individual activities. Improving these aspects would make the model more valuable for researchers studying aflatoxin biosynthesis and for computational analyses of GO-CAM models.