Skip to content

Now I'll analyze the GO-CAM model and provide my review.

Review of GO-CAM Model: gomodel:64d5781900000443

Model Overview

Title: Inhibition of cGAS-STING signaling in the cytosol by TREX1 (Human)
Taxon: Human (NCBITaxon:9606)
Status: Production
Model ID: gomodel:64d5781900000443

Model Summary

This GO-CAM model represents the inhibition of cGAS-STING signaling in the cytosol by TREX1 in humans. The model focuses on how TREX1 (three-prime repair exonuclease 1) acts as a negative regulator of cGAS (cyclic GMP-AMP synthase) activity, preventing inappropriate activation of the innate immune response by self-DNA.

Model Components

The model includes the following key proteins: 1. cGAS (UniProtKB:Q8N884) - A cytosolic DNA sensor that produces cGAMP upon detecting DNA 2. TREX1 (UniProtKB:Q9NSU2) - A 3'-5' DNA exonuclease that degrades cytosolic DNA

Model Activities and Processes

The model captures the following activities and biological processes:

  1. cGAS molecular condensate scaffold activity (GO:0140693)
  2. Enabled by cGAS (UniProtKB:Q8N884)
  3. Occurs in the cytosol (GO:0005829)
  4. Part of cGAS/STING signaling pathway (GO:0140896)

  5. Evidence: Direct assay evidence (ECO:0000314) from PMID:32912999 and PMID:32911482

  6. cGAS double-stranded DNA binding (GO:0003690)

  7. Enabled by cGAS (UniProtKB:Q8N884)
  8. Occurs in the cytosol (GO:0005829)
  9. Part of cGAS/STING signaling pathway (GO:0140896)

  10. Evidence: Direct assay evidence (ECO:0000314) from PMID:32911482 and PMID:32912999

  11. cGAS 2',3'-cyclic GMP-AMP synthase activity (GO:0061501)

  12. Enabled by cGAS (UniProtKB:Q8N884)
  13. Occurs in the cytosol (GO:0005829)
  14. Part of cGAS/STING signaling pathway (GO:0140896)

  15. Evidence: Direct assay evidence (ECO:0000314) from PMID:32911482 and PMID:32912999

  16. TREX1 double-stranded DNA 3'-5' DNA exonuclease activity (GO:0008311)

  17. Enabled by TREX1 (UniProtKB:Q9NSU2)
  18. Occurs in the endoplasmic reticulum membrane (GO:0005789)
  19. Part of negative regulation of cGAS/STING signaling pathway (GO:0160049)
  20. Evidence: Direct assay evidence (ECO:0000314) from PMID:33476576

Causal Relationships

The model includes the following causal relationships:

  1. TREX1 double-stranded DNA 3'-5' DNA exonuclease activity (RO:0012010) → cGAS double-stranded DNA binding

  2. Evidence: Direct assay evidence (ECO:0000314) from PMID:33476576

  3. cGAS molecular condensate scaffold activity (RO:0002629) → cGAS 2',3'-cyclic GMP-AMP synthase activity

  4. Evidence: Direct assay evidence (ECO:0000314) from PMID:30842659 and PMID:30842662

  5. cGAS double-stranded DNA binding (RO:0002629) → cGAS molecular condensate scaffold activity

  6. Evidence: Direct assay evidence (ECO:0000314) from PMID:32911482 and PMID:32912999

Scientific Evaluation

Biological Accuracy

The model accurately represents the current understanding of cGAS activation and its inhibition by TREX1:

  1. cGAS Activation Mechanism: The model correctly shows that double-stranded DNA binding by cGAS leads to its molecular condensate scaffold activity, which then enables its enzymatic function to produce cGAMP. This is consistent with recent literature showing that cGAS undergoes phase separation upon DNA binding, which is crucial for its activation.

  2. TREX1 Inhibitory Role: The model correctly represents TREX1's role in degrading cytosolic DNA, which prevents cGAS from binding to DNA and becoming activated. This is consistent with research showing that TREX1 prevents inappropriate activation of the cGAS-STING pathway by self-DNA.

  3. Subcellular Locations: The model accurately represents the subcellular locations - cGAS activities in the cytosol and TREX1 activity at the endoplasmic reticulum membrane.

Consistency with GO-CAM Guidelines

The model follows GO-CAM best practices in several ways:

  1. Molecular Activities: Each protein is appropriately annotated with its specific molecular function.

  2. Causal Connections: The causal relationships between molecular activities are represented using appropriate relationship types (RO:0002629 for 'directly positively regulates' and RO:0012010 for causal relationship from TREX1 to cGAS).

  3. Evidence: All annotations are supported by appropriate evidence codes and literature references.

Areas for Improvement

While the model is generally well constructed, I've identified a few potential areas for improvement:

  1. TREX1 Mechanism Clarification: The connection between TREX1 and cGAS DNA binding uses RO:0012010, which isn't one of the standard causal relationship predicates mentioned in your guidelines (RO:0002413, RO:0002629, RO:0002630, RO:0002304, RO:0002305). A more standard predicate like RO:0002630 (directly negatively regulates) might be more appropriate to represent TREX1's inhibitory effect on cGAS DNA binding.

  2. Molecular Complexes: The model represents individual proteins rather than complexes. This is appropriate in this case since each protein's distinct activity is known, but it might be worth clarifying if TREX1 functions as a dimer or if other components are involved in its regulation of cGAS.

  3. Biological Context: The model could potentially be expanded to include additional context, such as the downstream consequences of cGAMP production (activation of STING) and the resulting immune response.

  4. Feedback Regulation: The model could potentially be enhanced by including any known feedback mechanisms regulating either cGAS or TREX1 activity.

Literature Support

The model is well-supported by recent literature:

  1. The papers cited (PMID:32911482, PMID:32912999) provide strong structural evidence for how cGAS binds to DNA and how this binding is regulated.

  2. The references support the key biological assertions made in the model about the relationships between DNA binding, phase separation (molecular condensate scaffold activity), and enzymatic function of cGAS.

  3. The inhibitory role of TREX1 is supported by the cited literature, though I couldn't access the full text of PMID:33476576 to verify all details.

Conclusion

Overall, this GO-CAM model (gomodel:64d5781900000443) provides an accurate and well-structured representation of the inhibition of cGAS-STING signaling by TREX1 in human cells. The model effectively captures the key molecular activities and causal relationships in this pathway, with strong supporting evidence from the literature.

The model could be slightly improved by clarifying the causal relationship predicate used for TREX1's effect on cGAS, and potentially expanded to include additional context about downstream signaling and feedback regulation. However, these are minor suggestions for an already well-constructed model that adheres to GO-CAM best practices and accurately represents current scientific knowledge.