Skip to content

Based on all the information I've gathered, I'll now review the GO-CAM model "ITCH and UBR5 catalyzed branched-linked polyubiquitination of TXNIP (Human)".

Review of GO-CAM Model: gomodel:6606056e00000767

Model Overview

This model (gomodel:6606056e00000767) describes how the E3 ubiquitin ligases ITCH and UBR5 catalyze branched-linked polyubiquitination of TXNIP (Thioredoxin-interacting protein) in humans.

Biological Content Analysis

Core Components:

  1. TXNIP (UniProtKB:Q9H3M7) - Thioredoxin-interacting protein functions as an enzyme inhibitor in response to oxidative stress.
  2. ITCH (UniProtKB:Q96J02) - E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase that catalyzes ubiquitination of multiple proteins.
  3. UBR5 (UniProtKB:O95071) - E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase that typically functions in branch-linked ubiquitination.

Pathway Description:

The model represents how ITCH and UBR5 work together to create branched-linked polyubiquitin chains on TXNIP, leading to its proteasomal degradation. ITCH creates initial 'Lys-63'-linked ubiquitin chains on TXNIP, which are then modified by UBR5 to create 'Lys-48'/'Lys-63' branched chains that target TXNIP for degradation by the proteasome.

Evidence Support:

The model is supported by direct experimental evidence from PMID:29378950 which demonstrates that K63-linked polyubiquitination by ITCH triggers proteasome-mediated degradation of TXNIP through subsequent assembly of K48/K63 branched ubiquitin chains. TXNIP's cellular localization is supported by PMID:14632196. TXNIP's role in response to oxidative stress is based on evidence from PMID:17603038.

Technical Review

Model Structure:

The model includes three activities: 1. TXNIP's enzyme inhibitor activity (GO:0004857) in the cytoplasm 2. ITCH's ubiquitin-ubiquitin ligase activity (GO:0034450) 3. UBR5's ubiquitin-ubiquitin ligase activity (GO:0034450)

Causal Relationships:

  • ITCH's ubiquitin-ubiquitin ligase activity provides input for (RO:0002413) UBR5's activity
  • UBR5's ubiquitin-ubiquitin ligase activity directly negatively regulates (RO:0002630) TXNIP's enzyme inhibitor activity

Process Annotations:

  • TXNIP's activity is part of response to oxidative stress (GO:0006979)
  • Both ITCH and UBR5's activities are part of protein branched polyubiquitination (GO:0141198)

Critical Assessment

Strengths:

  1. The model accurately captures the cooperation between ITCH and UBR5 in forming branched ubiquitin chains on TXNIP.
  2. The causal relationships correctly represent the sequential action of ITCH providing substrate for UBR5, and the negative regulation of TXNIP's function.
  3. The use of evidence from direct experimental assays provides strong support for the model's assertions.
  4. The subcellular localization of TXNIP in the cytoplasm is properly annotated.

Issues:

  1. Redundant Causal Association: There are duplicate causal associations between ITCH and UBR5. The model shows two identical "provides input for" (RO:0002413) relationships from ITCH to UBR5, which is redundant.

  2. Missing Proteasome Process: While the model captures the branched polyubiquitination, it doesn't explicitly include the proteasomal degradation process that follows. Since the title references proteasomal degradation and the paper clearly shows this outcome, including GO:0043161 (proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic process) would improve completeness.

  3. Ubiquitination Chain Specificity: The model doesn't specify the types of ubiquitin chains involved (K48/K63 branched chains), which is a key aspect of the biological mechanism described in the paper.

Recommendations:

  1. Remove one of the duplicate causal associations between ITCH and UBR5.

  2. Consider adding an additional process annotation for proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic process (GO:0043161) to better represent the ultimate fate of TXNIP.

  3. If possible within the GO-CAM framework, consider specifying the ubiquitin chain types involved (K48/K63 branched chains) to better capture the mechanism's specificity.

Conclusion:

Overall, this is a well-constructed GO-CAM model that represents the current understanding of how ITCH and UBR5 cooperate to regulate TXNIP through branched polyubiquitination. The model follows GO-CAM best practices for representing complex molecular interactions. With minor adjustments to address the duplicate causal association and possibly include the downstream degradation process, it would be an even more comprehensive representation of this biological pathway.