Based on my comprehensive review of the GO-CAM model with ID gomodel:66c7d41500000544, here's my assessment:
Review of GO-CAM Model: CAAX-box protein maturation 1 (Mouse)¶
Model ID: gomodel:66c7d41500000544
General Overview¶
This GO-CAM model represents the CAAX-box protein maturation pathway in mice (NCBITaxon:10090). The model is in production status and illustrates the enzymatic cascade involved in post-translational processing of proteins containing a CAAX-box motif, which is an important process for proper membrane localization and function of many proteins including members of the RHO family.
Biological Content Assessment¶
Pathway Structure¶
The model effectively captures the sequential steps in CAAX-box protein maturation:
-
The initial step involves the CAAX-protein geranylgeranyltransferase complex (GO:0005953), composed of Fnta (MGI:MGI:104683) and Pggt1b (MGI:MGI:1917514), which adds a geranylgeranyl group to the cysteine residue of the CAAX motif.
-
This is followed by Rce1 (MGI:MGI:1336895) which performs endopeptidase activity to remove the -AAX portion of the motif.
-
Finally, Icmt (MGI:MGI:1888594) performs the methylation of the C-terminal prenylated cysteine residue.
-
The model also includes a regulatory component where Musk (MGI:MGI:103581) positively regulates the initial geranylgeranyltransferase activity.
Evidence Support¶
The model is well-supported by experimental evidence: - Most associations are backed by mutant phenotype evidence (ECO:0000315) or direct assay evidence (ECO:0000314) - The references cited (e.g., PMID:14622576, PMID:10085069, PMID:10747846) are appropriate for the process described - The reviewed papers support the connections between components, particularly the paper by Luo et al. (PMID:14622576) which provides solid evidence for the regulatory role of Musk in geranylgeranyltransferase activity
Causal Relationships¶
The causal relationships are accurately represented using appropriate predicates: - RO:0002413 (provides input for) is used correctly to connect the sequential enzymatic activities in the pathway - RO:0002629 (directly positively regulates) properly represents Musk's regulatory role on the geranylgeranyltransferase complex
Chemical Entities¶
The model properly includes the relevant chemical entities: - CHEBI:57533 (geranylgeranyl diphosphate) as input to the first enzyme - CHEBI:86021 (S-geranylgeranyl-L-cysteine residue) as output of the first enzyme/input to the next - CHEBI:59789 (S-adenosyl-L-methionine) as a cofactor for methylation - CHEBI:57856 (S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine) as a byproduct - CHEBI:87167 (S-[(2E,6E)-farnesyl]-L-cysteine methyl ester) as the final product
Quality Control Assessment¶
Best Practices Compliance¶
The model follows GO-CAM best practices: - Activities have appropriate molecular functions, cellular components (when relevant), and biological process associations - Causal connections are biologically meaningful and correctly represent the pathway flow - The protein complex (GGTase-I) is correctly modeled with its component subunits
Parsimony and Clarity¶
- The model effectively represents the essential steps in CAAX-box protein maturation without unnecessary complexity
- The structure is clear and would be easily understandable by biologists familiar with protein prenylation
Consistency with Literature¶
- The model aligns well with the key papers cited, particularly Luo et al. (PMID:14622576), which describes the role of geranylgeranyltransferase in synapse formation
- The biological roles of these enzymes are consistent with the current understanding of CAAX-box protein processing
Recommendations¶
The model is generally well-constructed, but I have a few minor recommendations:
-
Subcellular Location: The Icmt activity (protein C-terminal S-isoprenylcysteine carboxyl O-methyltransferase) is correctly annotated as occurring in the endoplasmic reticulum membrane (GO:0005789), but the other activities could also benefit from cellular location annotations for completeness.
-
Biological Context: While the model accurately represents the enzymatic pathway, adding some additional context about the biological significance of this process in mice might enhance the model's value (though this is optional).
-
Additional Evidence: For a few of the "has_input" and "has_output" associations, there isn't specific evidence listed. Adding evidence for these relationships would strengthen the model further.
Conclusion¶
This GO-CAM model is a well-constructed representation of CAAX-box protein maturation in mice. It effectively captures the essential enzymatic steps, regulatory mechanisms, and chemical transformations involved in this process. The evidence is well-documented and the causal connections are biologically meaningful. With the minor enhancements suggested above, this would be an exemplary GO-CAM model for this important post-translational modification pathway.