Skip to content

66c7d41500000841 heme biosynthetic process GO 0006783

Based on my review of the GO-CAM model and checking against best practices, here's my assessment:

Review Summary for GO-CAM Model gomodel:66c7d41500000841

Positive Aspects

  1. Complete Pathway Representation: The model successfully captures the full heme biosynthetic pathway from 5-aminolevulinate synthase through ferrochelatase, as well as the branching pathways to heme A and siroheme.

  2. Appropriate Evidence: All activities have appropriate evidence codes (ECO terms) and references (PMID or GO_REF).

  3. Correct Causal Relationships: The activities are properly connected using the "provides input for" predicate (RO:0002413), showing the flow of the pathway.

  4. Proper Cellular Localization: Correct cellular compartments are specified for relevant enzymes.

  5. Input/Output Molecules: The model appropriately includes substrate and product molecules for enzymatic reactions.

Suggested Improvements

  1. Missing Has_Input Annotations: Some activities are missing explicit has_input annotations that would clarify the substrate-product relationships. For example:
  2. The ferrochelatase activity (SPCC320.09/hem15) is missing its iron input

  3. Some intermediate steps are missing explicit input molecules

  4. Complex Handling: The model doesn't include any protein complexes, but it should be verified if any of these enzymes function as complexes in S. pombe.

  5. Potential Regulatory Relationships: The model exclusively uses the "provides input for" causal relationship (RO:0002413). If any direct regulatory relationships exist (such as feedback inhibition that is common in biosynthetic pathways), these could be captured using regulatory relationships like "directly positively regulates" (RO:0002629) or "directly negatively regulates" (RO:0002630).

  6. Branch Points Clarity: The branching of the pathway to siroheme biosynthesis from uroporphyrinogen III is correctly shown, but the clarity of this branch point could be improved by adding more explicit annotations about the branching relationship.

  7. Connectivity Check: I notice that the ferrochelatase (hem15) appears to be an endpoint without showing connections to how heme b is further processed to heme a. The connection between the main heme synthesis path and the heme A biosynthesis branch could be made more explicit.

Additional Recommendations

  1. Pathway Completeness Verification: Check literature to ensure all known regulatory mechanisms of the pathway in S. pombe are included.

  2. Human Readability: While the model captures the pathway steps accurately, consider if the layout and organization optimize human understanding of the overall pathway flow.

  3. Species-Specific Details: Verify that any known S. pombe-specific aspects of heme biosynthesis are accurately captured, as there can be species-specific variations in this pathway.

Overall Assessment

This is a well-constructed GO-CAM model that effectively represents the heme biosynthetic pathway in S. pombe. The model follows most GO-CAM best practices and provides valuable information about the molecular functions, their cellular locations, and the overall pathway organization. The suggested improvements are relatively minor and would mainly enhance the completeness and clarity of the model rather than correct any significant errors.